🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where African descendants are paid to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the month is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to remove Black history and experience from the archives is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month represents how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.